Hardcover: 120 pages
Publisher: Princeton University Press (September 29, 2015)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0691167141
ISBN-13: 978-0691167145
Product Dimensions: 4.6 x 0.6 x 7.1 inches
Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (26 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #73,757 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #29 in Books > Business & Money > Economics > Income Inequality #46 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Social Philosophy #148 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Public Affairs & Policy > Economic Policy
This is a really short book, less than 100 pages, which pages are not even full-size to begin with. I read it on a flight from Miami to New York and still had time to do the "hard" Sudoku puzzle in the airline magazine.But it is well worth reading. Simply stated, the author,a professor of philosophy at Princeton who previously wrote a popular book called "On Bullsh*t" bluntly rejects the pursuit of economic equality as a morally valid goal. He characterizes such a pursuit as "alienating" a person from his or her own self, by defining said person by reference to what others have or lack. Using economic equality to define a person's moral status means that if one has more income or wealth than others, one should feel guilt, and if one has less, one should feel victimized. This means that people can not be satisfied or happy based on their personal assessment of their own lives and that is why he defines the economic equality frame as "alienating". For some reason I don't quite understand, he eschews use of words like "envy", "jealousy" or "covetousness" to describe that state of mind.He also discusses attempts to justify economic equality based on the theory of "diminishing marginal utility" which postulates that the marginal value of an additional dollar to a person who is already well off is less than to a person who has substantial needs. First, he notes, that such an argument is really an argument for a basic level of sufficiency, not ultimate equality. Once both persons have a sufficient amount, and what is being compared is two persons' desire to purchase a discretionary item, the proposition is not credible.
Harry Frankfurt's chief attractions are his clear arguments and his short, easy to read books. His On Bullshit was welcome because there is indeed so much long-winded bullshit in professional philosophy and social theory journals and books. People who have virtually noting new to say find ways to say it with big words, in in my territory, tons of equations and esoteric references.In this book, Frankfurt argues that egalitarianism, by which he means favoring equal distribution of wealth and income, is not a moral ideal. By that he means that there is no reason to favor more equal over less equal on principle, although there may be moral effects of inequality that are undesirable. What is morally important, he argues, is that people have enough of what they need to live a decent life. If that requires some form of distributional equity, so be it. He also argues that excessive consumption by the well off, in the face of the destitution of the poor, is a form of gluttony that is disgusting and offensive. The rich should not act that way. But that does not imply that equality, or even a move towards equality, it a moral good in and of itself.I quite agree with this argument. Perhaps more important, I believe that at least in my society (the USA), almost everyone agrees that inequality is not a moral evil, although many do not agree, as Frankfurt and argue, that poverty is a moral evil. I believe it is inherently unfair that a child born in one family have a much greater chance at a decent life than a child born in another family. I do not believe that this is completely remedial as long as children are raised in families and families are heterogeneous in their capacity to raise their children properly.
Inequality in School Discipline: Research and Practice to Reduce Disparities Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences Styling Masculinity: Gender, Class, and Inequality in the Men's Grooming Industry The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote and the Transformation of American Politics (Issues in American Democracy) More Beautiful and More Terrible: The Embrace and Transcendence of Racial Inequality in the United States A Poverty of Rights: Citizenship and Inequality in Twentieth-Century Rio de Janeiro Restructuring Patriarchy: The Modernization of Gender Inequality in Brazil, 1914-1940 Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America Social Stratification and Inequality Marriage Markets: How Inequality is Remaking the American Family Just Medicine: A Cure for Racial Inequality in American Health Care Dispossession and the Environment: Rhetoric and Inequality in Papua New Guinea (Leonard Hastings Schoff Lectures) Speaking of Sex: The Denial of Gender Inequality Risk Inequality and Welfare States: Social Policy Preferences, Development, and Dynamics (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics (Paperback)) The Inequality Reader: Contemporary and Foundational Readings in Race, Class, and Gender The Family: Diversity, Inequality, and Social Change When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America A Nation for All: Race, Inequality, and Politics in Twentieth-Century Cuba (Envisioning Cuba) Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States A Discourse on Inequality (Penguin Classics)