File Size: 397 KB
Print Length: 145 pages
Publisher: OUP Oxford; 1 edition (August 25, 2011)
Publication Date: August 25, 2011
Sold by: Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ISBN-10: 019280345X
ISBN-13: 978-0192803450
ASIN: B005WSNY3A
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #110,430 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store) #9 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Nonfiction > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Movements > Deconstruction #14 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Movements > Deconstruction #28 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Biographies & Memoirs > Professionals & Academics > Philosophers
I'm not a big Derrida fan, but have tried from time-to-time to understand his appeal (one-time appeal) to so many American academics. Since most of Derrida's own writing is impenetrable (sometimes, I think, by design), I have turned to secondary accounts of his life and work and have found some understanding there.Prof. Glendinning's Very Short Introduction is for me, however, not one of the more helpful guides. Too much of the prose mimics Derrida's style in its unnecessary complexity, making much of its meaning obscure. Of course that could be the point since actual meaning (outside the mystical realm) does not seem to be possible in the written world Derrida purports to describe, deconstruct or dismember.Since so much of Derrida's "original" thought seems tied to Plato (who was closer in time to the real logos, that which was in the beginning, than was Derrida), I wonder if maybe reading Plato and forgetting Derrida altogether would be a more productive, beneficial and satisfying use of one's time for those interested in Derrida's Platonic razzmatazz.Yet the only tools I have at hand to express my views are "signifiers of signifiers." And this puts me far away from the original logos, and far out of touch with the idea of its mystical return, it's second coming, which is, it appears, Deconstruction itself, or at least the prophet of Deconstruction, our latter-day Jeremiah who is signified "Jacques." So nothing I can say, or perhaps merely write, has any meaning, at least not any of which I can be aware.I think of the decoder rings in cereal boxes when I was a kid. Then I think of deconstruction. Who created the code on those rings? And was the code the original deconstructor?
Derrida: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Computer Science: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Documentary Film: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Colonial America: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) American History: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Tudors: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Vikings: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Ancient Assyria: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Napoleonic Wars: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) History: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) American Immigration: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Crime Fiction: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Beats: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Modernism: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Dada and Surrealism: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) German Literature: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)